Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (23) (remove)
Language
- English (18)
- German (4)
- Multiple languages (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (23) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (23)
Keywords
- Entrepreneurship (2)
- Intergenerational Collaboration (2)
- Intergenerational Innovation (2)
- Sentiment Analysis (2)
- Challenges to Startups (1)
- Children Refugee (1)
- Collaboration Challenges (1)
- Collaborative OER (1)
- Controlling (1)
- DSR (1)
We describe the general concept, system architecture, hardware, and the behavioral abilities of Cora (Cooperative Robot Assistant, see Fig. 1), an autonomous non mobile robot assistant. Outgoing from our basic assumption that the behavior to perform determines the internal and external structure of the behaving system, we have designed Cora anthropomorphic to allow for humanlike behavioral strategies in solving complex tasks. Although Cora was built as a prototype of a service robot system to assist a human partner in industrial assembly tasks, we will show that Cora’s behavioral abilities are also conferrable in a household environment. After the description of the hardware platform and the basic concepts of our approach, we present some experimental results by means of an assembly task.
Fahrerassistenzsysteme werden eingesetzt, um dem Fahrer
eines Kraftfahrzeugs Handlungsabläufe abzunehmen. Diese Handlungsabläufe
werden definiert durch eine Aufgabenstellung, die vom Fahrer an das Fahrerassi-
stenzsystem übergeben oder systembedingt gelöst wird. Bei komplexen Fahreras-
sistenzsystemen ist an eine autonome Navigation im Straßenverkehr gedacht. Es
wird ein neues Verfahren vorgestellt, welches eine Bewegungssteuerung eines
autonomen Fahrzeugs durchführen kann. Es werden der Lenkwinkel und die Ge-
schwindigkeit beeinflußt. Für diese Aufgabe wird ein dynamischer Ansatz aus
dem Bereich der neuronalen Felder gewählt. Relevante Attribute für den Fahrt-
verlauf auf unterschiedlichem Abstraktionsniveau können dabei einfach (additiv)
verarbeitet werden.
Public transportation will become highly automated in the future, and at some point, human drivers are no longer necessary. Today many people are skeptical about such scenarios of autonomous public transport (abbr.: APT). In this paper, we assess users’ subjective priority of different factors that lead to personal acceptance or rejection of APT using an adapted online version of the Q-Methodology with 44 participants. We found four prototypical attitudes to which subgroups of participants relate: 1) technical enthusiasts, 2) social skeptics, 3) service-oriented non-enthusiasts, and 4) technology-oriented non-enthusiasts. We provide an unconventional perspective on APT acceptance that helps practitioners prioritize design requirements and communicate, targeting users’ specific attitudes.